A board member connected to an international animal-cruelty scandal
Susan Kilsby serves on Diageo’s board but has a history the company would rather keep quiet. In 2025, Unilever broke its global cage-free commitment, which leaves millions of hens in cages. It’s one of the most damning international animal-cruelty scandals (opens in new tab) in the food industry today.
Diageo refuses to part ways with Susan Kilsby.
We’ll share how much Susan Kilsby benefits from these lucrative board assignments on October 29th at HowMuchIsSusanKilsbyPaid.com (opens in new tab).
They took climate and “responsible drinking” out of the boss’s bonus
Diageo spent years telling the public it took sustainability seriously. In 2020 it built environmental and social goals like water efficiency, carbon reduction, positive drinking, and diversity directly into its executives’ long-term bonuses, worth 20% of senior executives’ long-term incentive pay.
In 2026, it quietly deleted them.
In its most recent annual report, Diageo’s long-term incentive plan drops from eight performance measures to just three: earnings per share, cash flow, and return on invested capital. All financial. The remuneration committee’s chair confirmed ESG measures “will no longer be included as separately weighted elements.”
This is textbook greenwashing.
Diageo wants the green halo in the advertising and its website, but in reality it strips out the accountability mechanisms that were supposed to make it mean something. A promise nobody is paid to keep, and nobody is punished for breaking, isn’t a commitment, but rather an empty marketing asset.
Up to £20 million for the boss. The axe for others.
Diageo’s new chief executive, Sir Dave Lewis, could earn up to £20 million for a single year if the company’s turnaround hits its targets. So far this year, “Drastic Dave” cut nearly 2,000 jobs, which is over 6% of its entire workforce, as part of a restructuring drive worth roughly $1.2 billion.
His predecessor didn’t leave empty-handed either: departing CEO Debra Crew collected around $4.9 million for her final year, despite a rocky tenure in which Diageo’s share price fell more than 40%.
Diageo rewards its executives and board members richly while at the same time eliminating thousands of jobs. The cost of Diageo’s corporate greed is job loss for its workers.
Scottish workers are being pushed to strike
In Fife, Scotland workers at Diageo’s Cameronbridge distillery, one of the largest grain distilleries in Europe, are balloting for strike action after the company moved to cut jobs. In September 2026, GMB Scotland members voted 75% in favor of action (on a 73% turnout), with Unite members backing action alongside them.
The unions say Diageo pushed the cuts through without proper consultation. More than 70 roles have been put under review, according to the union. Their industrial officer put it plainly: the company is “treating its workforce with contempt.”
This is the same company that just decided its leaders no longer need climate or social targets to earn their bonuses. Workers suffer from executive ineptitude and greed.
Diageo wants credit for the promises.
Not the accountability.
Why is Diageo keeping a director who is tied to an international animal-cruelty scandal in the boardroom? Why is Diageo stripping the climate targets out of the bonus? Why is Diageo cutting over 6% of its workforce while executives benefit?
Sources
- ESG removed from executive pay: Just Drinks (opens in new tab), Business Post (opens in new tab), Diageo remuneration (opens in new tab)
- CEO pay & job cuts: The Drinks Business (opens in new tab), Food Dive (opens in new tab), The Grocer (opens in new tab)
- Cameronbridge strike: The Spirits Business (opens in new tab), Grocery Gazette (opens in new tab)
This is an independent accountability project. All statements are drawn from the published sources linked above. “Diageo,” “Guinness,” and “Unilever” are trademarks of their respective owners; this site is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by them, and uses these names for the purposes of commentary and criticism.